Open-Weight AI Loses Its Best Advocate at the Worst Possible Time
This article originally appeared in Galaxy Research's weekly newsletter. Subscribe to get timely insights delivered to your inbox every Friday morning.
WHAT HAPPENED
Jensen Huang resigned as Nvidia CEO after admitting marital infidelity and following news reports he had multiple affairs, including one with a woman suspected by the U.S. government to be an asset of Chinese intelligence.
Nvidia said Thursday that Huang, 63, stepped down as president, CEO and board member effective immediately, ending a 33-year run atop the company he co-founded in 1993. CFO Colette Kress was named interim CEO while the board weighs internal and external successors, and former Synopsys chief Harvey C. Jones became Nvidia's first-ever chairman. The company gave no reason for the shake-up. The exit came four days after Huang told employees he had been unfaithful to his wife, and after the board opened a probe into whether he had been the target of a "foreign intelligence effort" while initially saying it retained confidence in him.
The woman at the center of the story is Alice Huang (a.k.a. Huang Le, no relation), a Chinese citizen and former top executive at Megaspeed, a Singapore-based data center company. It was spun out of a Chinese gaming firm in 2023, shortly after Biden-era chip export controls tightened. Megaspeed became an official Nvidia cloud partner, buying Nvidia GPUs and renting the compute to Chinese firms including Alibaba. U.S. authorities have reportedly investigated Megaspeed since 2024 over suspected diversion of chips into China, and Singapore opened its own probe in October. The Information has reported, citing two people who know her, that Alice Huang helped arrange at least $7.5 billion of Nvidia chip shipments that moved roughly 240,000 restricted chips into China.
The New York Times reported on Oct. 29 that U.S. intelligence, surveilling Alice Huang during the Megaspeed investigation, concluded she had been recruited by China's Ministry of State Security (MSS) and was passing information to Beijing, and that she had developed a close relationship with Jensen Huang. Her alleged objectives were to gather intelligence on Nvidia's plans and on Huang's lobbying of the Trump administration to loosen export controls, and potentially to push him to advocate for selling Nvidia's most advanced chips into China. Officials reportedly did not believe Huang knew about her alleged role, and he reportedly never received a defensive briefing. On Nov. 6, the Financial Times reported that a U.S. intelligence memo, circulated among senior officials before President Trump's May trip to Beijing, described Jensen's relationship with Alice as romantic. Nvidia has said it does not share classified information with customers, Beijing has called the allegations smears, and no public reporting shows Jensen Huang knowingly passed anything along. The chairs of the House China, Foreign Affairs and Intelligence committees have asked him to testify in a closed-door briefing on Nov. 18.
The second shoe dropped Wednesday night. The Times reported, citing video evidence its reporters had heard descriptions of from unnamed sources but not seen, that Huang also had an affair with Kimberly Powell, Nvidia's vice president of health care and a subordinate. Nvidia's code of conduct cites personal relationships as a conflict of interest, and the board met that night to discuss whether to oust him. Hours after Thursday's resignation announcement, Reuters reported a third relationship, with another Nvidia employee it did not name, citing two unnamed sources (neither Huang nor the employee has confirmed it). Shareholders have already filed a potential class action alleging Nvidia failed to disclose the relationship, and the company says it will still report quarterly results on Nov. 17 as scheduled.
Nvidia shares fell as much as 14.4% at Thursday's open, to $148.80 from Wednesday's $173.73 close, the stock's steepest intraday drop since the DeepSeek selloff of January 2025. Buyers stepped in quickly, and by midday the stock had pared losses to roughly 5%, around $165. That still leaves Nvidia more than 30% below its October all-time high, and the Wall Street Journal estimated the slide has erased close to $750 billion in market value since the scandal broke. Bernstein halved its price target from $400 to $200, and Stacy Rasgon, an analyst at the brokerage, noted that an affair with a direct report made it far harder for the board to keep Huang in place.
The broader market wobbled but held. Nvidia is roughly 6% of the S&P 500, and both the S&P 500 and the Nasdaq Composite opened lower as the S&P tech sector fell 1.3%. By midday both had turned modestly positive, helped by rallies in AMD and Broadcom that picked up the slack from Nvidia, along with strength in energy as oil rose. Investors appear to be treating this episode as a Nvidia governance shock rather than a referendum on AI demand, at least until the company reports results on Nov. 17.
OUR TAKE
The speed at which this story unfolded was striking. The FT published its memo report on Friday, Nov. 6. By Sunday, Huang had admitted infidelity and the board had opened a probe while publicly backing him. By Thursday morning, the founder who ran Nvidia for 33 years and built it into one of the world's most valuable companies was gone, with no named successor. Founder-CEOs of that stature have historically been close to untouchable. Notably, the intelligence concern had reportedly been known to senior U.S. officials for about a year without consequence. What likely broke the board's posture was the Powell report: a relationship with a direct report is a plain code-of-conduct breach, and since similar indiscretions by Intel's Brian Krzanich in 2018 and McDonald's Steve Easterbrook in 2019, boards have treated it as disqualifying regardless of stature. Layer on a securities class action, a Congressional summons and a national-security overlay, and it’s understandable that the board's tolerance collapsed in roughly 48 hours.
In the longer run, we are watching for potential consequences for open-weight AI. Huang was the most important corporate champion of open models in the U.S., and he backed it with the balance sheet: a five-year, $26 billion commitment to open-weight model development disclosed in an SEC filing; the Nemotron family, including a 550-billion-parameter open-weight Ultra model; a coalition of eight labs building frontier open models; stakes in Reflection AI and Thinking Machines; and a pending $12.9 billion acquisition of Hugging Face, the default distribution layer for open models. He also led a July open letter from about 25 companies urging Washington not to broadly restrict open-weight models, many of which are Chinese. With Meta retreating from fully open releases, Nvidia had become the primary U.S. counterweight to the Chinese labs that now lead in open weights.
Founder priorities rarely survive leadership transitions intact, and an interim CEO coming from the CFO seat, a stock down more than 30% from its high and a board in damage-control mode make discretionary spending a natural target. Multibillion-dollar open-model programs and a Hugging Face deal that has not closed (it is targeted for the first half of 2027, and the DOJ has begun asking questions) are the type of line items that could come under review.
The long-term viability of the open-weight movement in the U.S. is also at risk. The open-weight coalition just lost its best-resourced advocate in Washington at the worst possible moment, and the manner of his exit hands restrictionists a narrative: the executive most associated with both loosening China chip controls and defending open weights is now tied to an alleged asset of the Ministry of State Security. The two issues are distinct on the merits, but we expect them to become conflated, starting with the Nov. 18 Congressional briefing.
To be fair, Nvidia's incentive to support open weights does not leave with Huang. Every downloaded model is a GPU workload, and spreading AI beyond a handful of frontier labs that are designing their own silicon is core to Nvidia's moat. Hugging Face CEO Clem Delangue has vowed to keep fighting for open source, and the open-weight coalition includes Microsoft, Meta, IBM and Palantir. Our base case is erosion rather than reversal, but erosion matters. For crypto, open weights are the substrate for decentralized and privacy-preserving AI, local inference, and permissionless agents. A thinner U.S. open-weight frontier would leave builders more dependent on closed APIs, or on Chinese models that face growing political and regulatory risk in the U.S.
We will be watching whether Kress addresses Nemotron and Hugging Face on the Nov. 17 earnings call, whether the Hugging Face timeline holds, and how hard Capitol Hill leans on the open-weight question in its China hearings.
Legal Disclosure:
This document, and the information contained herein, has been provided to you by Galaxy Digital Inc. and its affiliates (“Galaxy Digital”) solely for informational purposes. This document may not be reproduced or redistributed in whole or in part, in any format, without the express written approval of Galaxy Digital. Neither the information, nor any opinion contained in this document, constitutes an offer to buy or sell, or a solicitation of an offer to buy or sell, any advisory services, securities, futures, options or other financial instruments or to participate in any advisory services or trading strategy. Nothing contained in this document constitutes investment, legal or tax advice or is an endorsement of any of the stablecoins mentioned herein. You should make your own investigations and evaluations of the information herein. Any decisions based on information contained in this document are the sole responsibility of the reader. Readers should consult with their own advisors and rely on their independent judgement when making financial or investment decisions.
Participants, along with Galaxy Digital, may hold financial interests in certain assets referenced in this content. Galaxy Digital regularly engages in buying and selling financial instruments, including through hedging transactions, for its own proprietary accounts and on behalf of its counterparties. Galaxy Digital also provides services to vehicles that invest in various asset classes. If the value of such assets increases, those vehicles may benefit, and Galaxy Digital’s service fees may increase accordingly. The information and analysis in this communication are based on technical, fundamental, and market considerations and do not represent a formal valuation. For more information, please refer to Galaxy’s public filings and statements. Certain asset classes discussed, including digital assets, may be volatile and involve risk, and actual market outcomes may differ materially from perspectives expressed here.
For additional risks related to digital assets, please refer to the risk factors contained in filings Galaxy Digital Inc. makes with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) from time to time, including in its Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2025, filed with the SEC on November 10, 2025, available at www.sec.gov.
Certain statements in this document reflect Galaxy Digital’s views, estimates, opinions or predictions (which may be based on proprietary models and assumptions, including, in particular, Galaxy Digital’s views on the current and future market for certain digital assets), and there is no guarantee that these views, estimates, opinions or predictions are currently accurate or that they will be ultimately realized. To the extent these assumptions or models are not correct or circumstances change, the actual performance may vary substantially from, and be less than, the estimates included herein. None of Galaxy Digital nor any of its affiliates, shareholders, partners, members, directors, officers, management, employees or representatives makes any representation or warranty, express or implied, as to the accuracy or completeness of any of the information or any other information (whether communicated in written or oral form) transmitted or made available to you. Each of the aforementioned parties expressly disclaims any and all liability relating to or resulting from the use of this information. Certain information contained herein (including financial information) has been obtained from published and non-published sources. Such information has not been independently verified by Galaxy Digital and, Galaxy Digital, does not assume responsibility for the accuracy of such information. Affiliates of Galaxy Digital may have owned, hedged and sold or may own, hedge and sell investments in some of the digital assets, protocols, equities, or other financial instruments discussed in this document. Affiliates of Galaxy Digital may also lend to some of the protocols discussed in this document, the underlying collateral of which could be the native token subject to liquidation in the event of a margin call or closeout. The economic result of closing out the protocol loan could directly conflict with other Galaxy affiliates that hold investments in, and support, such token. Except where otherwise indicated, the information in this document is based on matters as they exist as of the date of preparation and not as of any future date, and will not be updated or otherwise revised to reflect information that subsequently becomes available, or circumstances existing or changes occurring after the date hereof. This document provides links to other Websites that we think might be of interest to you. Please note that when you click on one of these links, you may be moving to a provider’s website that is not associated with Galaxy Digital. These linked sites and their providers are not controlled by us, and we are not responsible for the contents or the proper operation of any linked site. The inclusion of any link does not imply our endorsement or our adoption of the statements therein. We encourage you to read the terms of use and privacy statements of these linked sites as their policies may differ from ours. The foregoing does not constitute a “research report” as defined by FINRA Rule 2241 or a “debt research report” as defined by FINRA Rule 2242 and was not prepared by Galaxy Digital Partners LLC. Similarly, the foregoing does not constitute a “research report” as defined by CFTC Regulation 23.605(a)(9) and was not prepared by Galaxy Derivatives LLC. For all inquiries, please email [email protected].
©Copyright Galaxy Digital Inc. 2026. All rights reserved.