Weekly Top Stories - 05/08/26

Welcome to Galaxy Research's Weekly Top Stories. Subscribe to get this newsletter delivered to your inbox every Friday morning.

In this week's edition, Thad Pinakiewicz looks at this week’s big developments in equity tokenization; Will Owens unpacks Hyperliquid’s HIP-4 upgrade; and Lucas Tcheyan reports the vibes from Solana’s Accelerate gathering in Miami.

Got feedback on this newsletter? Email [email protected]. We’d love to hear from you.

Market Update

The total crypto market cap stands at $2.74tn, up 2.54% from last week (when it stood at $2.67tn). Bitcoin's network value is 4.92% of gold's market cap. Over the last seven days, BTC is up 3.70%, ETH is up 0.24%, and SOL is up 5.55%. Bitcoin dominance is 58.73%, down 22 basis points from last week.

The DTCC and Bullish are Bullish on Tokenized Securities

This week the DTCC announced that its tokenization service for DTC-custodied assets will launch this year, while crypto exchange Bullish announced a $4.2 billion deal to acquire Equiniti, a major global transfer agent. Taken separately, the stories are another pair of dozens of tokenization headlines. Taken together, they are about as clear a signal as you are going to get that a tidal wave of securities is moving onchain, and that the downstream effects for how investors interact with their portfolios may be much more interesting than most people realize.

The Depository Trust Company, the DTCC subsidiary that provides book-entry custody for more than $114 trillion in assets across equities, municipal bonds, corporate bonds, Treasuries and securities from more than 130 countries, expects to begin a limited first phase of tokenized real-world asset (RWA) trades in July, with a broader rollout targeted for October. The service is designed to support DTC-custodied assets with the same entitlements, protections and ownership rights as traditional holdings (unlike the wrapped tokens proliferating now that typically lack voting and governance rights). The DTC pilot covers highly liquid assets including Russell 1000 members, major index ETFs and Treasuries. The working group from the announcement includes more than 50 custodians, asset managers, broker-dealers and infrastructure firms across traditional and decentralized finance.

Meanwhile, Bullish is making moves further down the convoluted chain of securities custodianship, settlement, and issuance. The crypto exchange operator announced a $4.2 billion deal to acquire Equiniti, a global transfer agent serving nearly 3,000 issuer clients, more than 20 million shareholders and processing roughly $500 billion in annual payments. Bullish CEO Tom Farley described tokenization as a “once-in-a-generation shift,” and framed the deal as a way to combine tokenization infrastructure, a unified ledger, and blue-chip issuer relationships at scale.

Our Take

So there you have it. The world’s most important securities custodian is launching its tokenization infrastructure in months, and a crypto exchange just spent $4.2 billion to buy a transfer agent so it can sit at the issuance end of the same pipeline. True security tokenization at scale was always something that was “coming,” like fusion power or your bank’s new compliance dashboard: soon, transformational, and only real in the sense they were in a PowerPoint. With these announcements, the direction of travel is not ambiguous, and the timeframe has moved from “sometime in the future” to imminently.

True security tokenization was always like fusion power or your bank’s new compliance dashboard: 'coming soon,' transformational, and real only in the sense they were in a PowerPoint.

The more interesting question: what happens when equities live onchain at scale? Today, if a retail investor has a $200,000 stock portfolio, most of the useful financial activity around that portfolio is mediated by their broker. They can borrow against it through margin, at the broker’s rates, on the broker’s terms, inside the broker’s risk engine. Their shares may be lent out, often without them fully appreciating the mechanics, while the broker collects much of the economics. The yield, leverage, and collateral possibilities around an equity portfolio are real, but for most individuals they remain gated behind intermediaries, or unavailable to them entirely. Tokenized equities change that calculus. If a stock portfolio can become onchain collateral, then borrowing against it no longer has to mean accepting whatever the brokerage margin desk offers.

This is where the stock-lending desks should begin to feel a little existential discomfort. They've built genuinely profitable businesses on the opacity and friction of the current system. Stock lending is a business whose profitability has always depended on clients having nowhere else to go: your shares sit at your broker, and you take the terms they offer. Freely transferrable tokenized securities would give retail users the benefit of choice of DeFi lending markets, with transparent views into rates and risks of the platforms they choose. This open securities-lending market would put pressure on a business that has long benefited from opacity, fragmentation, and retail’s limited access.

Stock lending is a business whose profitability has always depended on clients having nowhere else to go.

There is, of course, a very large caveat. DTCC’s approach is not exactly a permissionless DeFi renaissance in a suit. The blockchain partners announced for the pilot are Canton Network, SEI, and Ripple — networks with substantial centralization baked in, that are permissioned or semi-permissioned at their core. The DTCC is not in the business of disintermediating DTCC. What it's building is a tokenized representation layer that still routes through institutional custody, just with better settlement plumbing.

But the closed nature is almost the point. The first mass-market onchain securities system was never going to be pure DeFi. It was going to be a capital-markets database that regulators can understand, brokers can integrate, and custodians can risk-manage. The interesting question is what happens if the regulators give the OK for those assets to exit their manicured walled garden into the untamed dark forest of true DeFi.

That tension will be an interesting story over the coming years. You'll have the DTCC's version of tokenization — technically on a blockchain, practically in a walled garden with a different database underneath. These are tokenized securities entitlements. Then there is the Bullish/Equiniti (and Galaxy/Superstate) angle, which is more explicitly about driving the entire process onchain, from issuance through to onchain capital markets. This is known as the “issuer sponsored” model, in SEC parlance, and is only ~$50m today, whereas the “third party sponsored” model (xStocks, Ondo, etc.) is ~$950m. Three competing models are now decently defined and awaiting market confirmation, competition, and regulatory guidance.

The first serious version of tokenized securities was always going to arrive wearing a suit, carrying a no-action letter, and saying “operational efficiency” a lot. Fine. Revolutions often arrive through the back office. The rails are nearly done being laid. The open question is who gets to ride them, who collects the tolls, and whether onchain equities become a genuinely new market for DeFi and permissionless finance, or just the old one with better APIs and a more fashionable database. – Thad Pinakiewicz

Hyperliquid Just Became a Prediction Market

Hyperliquid activated HIP-4 Outcome Markets on mainnet Saturday, bringing fully collateralized, onchain prediction contracts into the same account where traders already run perpetual futures and spot positions. The launch is the fourth in Hyperliquid’s improvement proposal series following HIP-1 (native token standard), HIP-2 (“hyperliquidity”), and HIP-3 (builder-deployed perps). HIP-4, co-authored by Bedlam Research and John Wang, head of crypto at Kalshi, was announced Feb. 2 (HYPE, the ecosystem’s native token, rallied >10% that day). It went to testnet the same week and now, three months later, is live.

HIP-4's mainnet launch came the same week Bloomberg reported Polymarket was seeking CFTC approval to bring its flagship international exchange onshore in the U.S. The prediction market sector posted $8.6 billion in taker volume in April 2026, with Kalshi overtaking Polymarket for the first time. Kalshi posted a record $14.81 billion in notional volume for April, a 13.3% increase over its prior record from March. Polymarket and Kalshi have now crossed $150 billion in combined lifetime trading volume (we predicted volumes would increase significantly this year). Analysts at Bernstein project prediction market volume growing from $51b in 2025 to $1t by 2030. Platforms industrywide are converging on the “trade everything” model, which I previously wrote about. HIP-4 is Hyperliquid’s entry.

So, what exactly is HIP-4? First, it adds outcome markets to HyperCore, Hyperliquid’s onchain trading engine. These are fully collateralized binary instruments that settle to either 0 or 1 at expiry based on whether a discrete real-world event occurred. The mechanic is simple and familiar to prediction markets traders: buy YES at price P. If the event occurs, the contract settles at 1 and you collect (1 – P) profit. Buy NO and the inverse applies. Maximum loss is always your entry cost. No leverage, no liquidations, no surprises. Contracts are denominated in USDH, Hyperliquid’s native stablecoin.

To deploy a market, a builder must stake 1,000,000 HYPE and then define the event title, resolution time, oracle source, and optional challenge window. Then, a ~15-minute single-price clearing auction opens the book and maximizes matched volume. Continuous limit/market order trading follows, with prices bounded from 0.001 to 0.999 until expiry. At settlement, an oracle posts 0 or 1 and USDH pays out automatically. The PnL cards look similar to a perps trade, just with the market's question as the title instead of an asset ticker, and your position size expressed as a number between 0 and 1 rather than a leveraged notional. A dispute window can delay finality if the resolution is challenged.

The first live contract covers a recurring daily BTC price threshold event that resets at 2 a.m. EST. This market is essentially “BTC above X price on Y date at Z time, YES or NO.”

Planned categories for expansion include politics, sports, macro data releases, crypto events, and entertainment. One 1m HYPE stake can support a recurring series. The stake doesn’t need to be re-posted for each new market in the same series.

HIP-4 also charges zero fees to open positions. Fees apply only when closing, burning, or settling. For traders, it is much more economic to predict the future on Hyperliquid versus Polymarket and Kalshi, which charge much higher fees.

Our Take

HIP-4 extends Hyperliquid's playbook: expand the product surface, deepen the margin account. The zero-fee-to-open model undercuts Polymarket’s take rate directly, and the cross-margin architecture is a structural advantage that neither Polymarket nor Kalshi can match without a full product rebuild. Every single outcome market trade on Hyperliquid feeds HYPE buybacks through the protocol flywheel as well.

The thing to watch is not whether HIP-4 "vamps" (drains liquidity from) Polymarket. It almost certainly won’t. Polymarket has 678k monthly active users and a UX lead that years of distribution built. What HIP-4 does is make Hyperliquid the only venue in crypto where a trader can run a perp book, spot positions, and event contracts under a single margin account. For active crypto-native traders (the audience Hyperliquid serves), that composability is a real draw.

It will be interesting to see how market variety evolves on Hyperliquid. Prediction markets live and die on discovery, and that’s just a product problem, not an infrastructure question. Some frontends are already integrating HIP-4. If the builder ecosystem fills in fast, the discovery gap can close faster than expected.

As we’ve written previously, trade[xyz], the leading permissionless perp deployer on Hyperliquid, has been pioneering new market launches via the protocol. Perhaps it will start doing the same with outcome markets and HIP-4. The project is well capitalized and has significant trust from the Hyperliquid ecosystem.

Also, as of 6:24 AM NYC time on Thursday, outcome trading now supports multi-outcome markets. This means that instead of a simple yes/no binary, a single market can cover a range of outcomes that are linked together for greater capital efficiency. The first is a recurring BTC price range market that settles daily, supporting upside, downside, and an in-between bucket. Docs are here. The team said additional features and markets will continue to be rolled out in stages.

For now: Hyperliquid just became a prediction market venue. The category it’s entering grew 17x in two years and is still scaling. The infrastructure is among the best in the space. The product is a work in progress. - Will Owens

While It ‘Accelerates,’ Solana Should Lean Into Memecoins

The Solana Foundation hosted the second annual Solana Accelerate USA on Tuesday in Miami, alongside Consensus Miami. Following last year's inaugural New York City edition, the event leaned heavily into institutional finance, with the Solana Foundation continuing its framing of "Internet Capital Markets."

Institutional and tokenization announcements were the centerpiece of the day. State Street and Galaxy launched SWEEP, a tokenized private liquidity fund that lets institutional holders sweep stablecoins (initially PYUSD) into a yield-bearing vehicle, seeded with ~$200m from Ondo. Securitize, Jump Trading, and Jupiter launched a three-way integration for fully onchain, regulated trading of tokenized U.S. equities. Anchorage Digital and J.P. Morgan Asset Management unveiled an exploratory "Cashless Reserves" model for tokenized stablecoin reserves. And Bullish (NYSE: BLSH) became the first NYSE-listed company to fully tokenize its own equity cap table, alongside the aforementioned $4.2bn acquisition of transfer agent Equiniti.

On payments and consumer distribution, Western Union launched USDPT, a U.S. dollar stablecoin issued by Anchorage Digital Bank to settle 24/7 across the remittance giant’s 360,000+ global agents, and SoFi committed to bring SoFiUSD to Solana. On AI, the Solana Foundation and Google Cloud unveiled Pay.sh, a stablecoin-native marketplace letting AI agents discover and pay for Google Cloud APIs.

Our Take

For the first time, it feels like Solana is building backwards. In other words, the ecosystem is trying to recapture market share in categories where others are already the clear leaders. Perpetuals are the cleanest example. Solana accounts for roughly 2% of total perps OI and averages just 5%-7% of volume on a 30-day trailing basis, while Hyperliquid sits near 70% of onchain perp volume and has expanded into commodities, prediction markets (as noted above), and permissionless market creation.

Prediction markets tell a similar story, with Polymarket entrenched as the category leader and Solana-native efforts mostly playing catch-up via integrations rather than original products. Winning share in these areas is clearly a priority for the Foundation and for teams across the ecosystem, but the realistic path is capturing a slice of a growing market rather than claiming leadership any time soon.

Where Solana does look genuinely well positioned is tokenized equities. The Securitize/Jump/Jupiter integration and Bullish's decision to make BLSH the first NYSE-listed cap table to live fully onchain are the week’s most consequential announcements, because they pair regulated U.S. broker-dealer and transfer-agent infrastructure with onchain liquidity venues for the first time. The rails for migrating real cap tables onchain are now being built, and Solana is making the case to be the leader. That said, this will be a long-term transition. Tokenized equities at scale require regulatory comfort, institutional adoption, and meaningful secondary-market liquidity that does not yet exist. What users want first is to trade those tokenized equities with leverage, where Hyperliquid again has dominated. Whether Solana can capture that demand depends in large part on whether new perp infrastructure like Phoenix, Bulk, and others can ship and attract meaningful liquidity in the coming quarters.

Perhaps controversially, my biggest takeaway from Accelerate is that Solana needs to lean into memecoins while it works to gain share in these other markets. Despite the stigma, memecoins are the engine that drove Solana's rise in 2024-2025 and have produced what is effectively a "memecoin industrial complex," composed of launchpads, trading terminals, proprietary automated market makers (prop AMMs), and decentralized exchanges (DEXs) whose volumes are dominated by long-tail, small-cap tokens. Even in the current downcycle, this stack is the dominant driver of Solana activity, accounting for more than 50% of the chain's fees every quarter.

Gaining traction in less cyclical and more serious industries is the right strategic bet for Solana's next decade. But in the meantime, the chain still pays its bills with retail speculation. Pretending otherwise would concede ground in the one category where Solana leads. - Lucas Tcheyan

Other News

• 🫢Michael Saylor says Strategy might sell BTC to pay dividends

• 🔮Kalshi raises $1b; valuation doubles from last round to $22b

• 🤖Coinbase to cut 14% of staff; CEO Armstrong cites AI

• ⚖️Lawyer tries to seize ETH tied to Kelp exploit from Arbitrum

• 🦑Kraken parent sues custodian Etana, alleging $25m fraud

• 🚀Anthropic to rent all AI capacity at SpaceX's data center

• 🤯SEC moves to end quarterly reporting requirement

• 👔Morgan Stanley rolls out crypto trading on E-Trade

• 🕛CME lists AVAX, Sui futures; 24-7 trading on track for 5/29

• 🎂📚Hayek’s “Denationalization of Money” turns 50 in October

Charts of the Week: Aave After the $290m DeFi Exploit

This week Galaxy Research published two reports on Aave. In the first we took a snapshot of the protocol’s loan book in the wake of the $290m rsETH exploit of April 18 and found that looping trades on Aave V3 Core are highly levered in aggregate. For example, e-mode loans, those whose parameters are designed for looping, have a weighted health factor of 1.055 and a debt-to-equity ratio of 10.42. This means a small collateral shock can move many of these loans toward stress and each dollar of collateral is carrying a large amount of debt.

Our other report showed how Aave markets reacted to the exploit in the hours and weeks that followed. Among other observations, we note the wrapped ether (WETH) utilization rate on Aave V3 Core was pinned to 100% for nearly two weeks, meaning lenders of WETH could not withdraw supplies from the pool for that period. - Zack Pokorny