skip to content

Here We Go Again: Binance Loses $6.3b in Largest Robbery in History 

Chart of the Week: Institutions Are Here, But What Kind? - thumbnail

This article originally appeared in Galaxy Research's weekly newsletter. Subscribe to get timely insights delivered to your inbox every Friday morning. Find our past reports and newsletters at galaxy.com/research. Send feedback to [email protected].

Binance, the world’s largest crypto exchange, was drained of roughly $6.3b across 10 blockchains on Thursday night. TRM Labs and Chainalysis attribute the attack to TraderTraitor, North Korea’s Lazarus-linked unit. As of writing, the exchange has not yet re-enabled withdrawals.

Start with scale. The benchmark for the largest robbery ever has long been the roughly $1b Saddam Hussein’s regime took from the Central Bank of Iraq on the eve of the 2003 invasion, about $1.8b in today’s dollars. Bybit beat that in nominal terms but not after inflation. Binance beats it on any measure. Even after roughly $2.5–3bn in freezes, this is the biggest heist of all time. Binance’s BTC outflows yesterday were 11 standard deviations higher than their 30-day average.

Weekly Research Brief: 🤦‍♂️ Here we go again - inline 1

Then the method. On Ethereum, the attacker used EIP-7702 to turn a Binance hot wallet into a sweeper contract that took orders only from the attacker. It was backed by 50 pre-signed authorizations, one for each upcoming transaction number (nonce), so whichever one came up next would work. The code was rehearsed on three test wallets hours beforehand. Within minutes of each other, nine more chains were emptied, each with different key types and signing schemes. That is someone with intimate knowledge of how Binance’s withdrawal systems work. This is Binance’s preliminary finding: a compromised DevOps engineer’s laptop gave access to a service container, with “no evidence of any wallet private key leak.”

Weekly Research Brief: 🤦‍♂️ Here we go again - inline 2
Weekly Research Brief: 🤦‍♂️ Here we go again - inline 3

Our take

We believe our previous thesis from Bitget is consistent here. Nobody attacks the private-key math. They attack whoever, or whatever, tells the math what to do.

The biggest mitigating factor of this exploit was stablecoin issuers. Tether froze about $1.77b in USDT, Circle about $825m in USDC, Ripple about $40m in RLUSD, and World Liberty about $28m in USD1. That’s a big part of why this appears to be a painful week rather than an existential one, and we believe Tether deserves credit for moving fast and at scale.

We also believe Circle deserves credit for the freeze. Circle has long said it freezes only when directed by law enforcement or a court, not in real time during an active hack. After April's $285m Drift exploit, CEO Jeremy Allaire went further, saying a private company deciding "what is the right path or not" would be a "moral quandary." During the Drift exploit, about $232m in stolen USDC moved through Circle's own cross-chain transfer protocol over roughly six hours without being frozen. But, on Thursday, Circle froze $823m about 40 minutes after the Ethereum sweep, "in coordination with law enforcement."

Does Binance have enough to cover the hole? The SAFU fund, about $1b in BTC, does not come close to covering it, so Binance says it will cover all losses from its own corporate funds. Last year’s 10/10 liquidation event cost Binance about $283m in depeg compensation plus its $400m “Together Initiative” ($300m in user vouchers and $100m in low-interest loans to institutions). That’s under $700m; this hack is roughly nine times that.

A better yardstick is the BNB burn. 2026’s three quarterly burns so far have retired about $3.2bn of BNB. Net of freezes, the hole is roughly one year of burns, or about 4% of the ~$144bn in assets Binance held before the attack. It is a staggering amount of money, but Binance does appear to have it, or at least the ability to earn its way out of a hole based on our own calculations of their revenue-funded BNB burns. While we can’t independently verify Binance’s whole financial condition, and we don’t know exactly what Binance plans to do, Binance Co-CEO Richard Teng said plainly: “Binance will cover all losses from the SAFU fund and company funds.”

What’s left: when will withdrawals reopen, where will the roughly $2.4b in ETH and BTC still in the attacker’s hands go next (THORChain, Tornado Cash, etc.), and how did an outsider come to know Binance’s systems this well? These are among the key specific questions we will be following in the coming days and weeks. But how the market reacts to the event broadly is also top of mind.

Bitcoin and other crypto assets are trading lower on the news. Alex Thorn’s piece from Monday (Why Now Is the Time to Add and Hold BTC) relies heavily on the 50-week moving average as a key level to maintain a bullish trend, with a break below that is not retaken within 1 month cited as invalidating the paper’s thesis. That 50w MA currently sits at $76,103, and at the time of writing BTCUSD is trading at $77,000. So far, the 50w MA has held, with BTC trading as low as $76,301 overnight on Coinbase. Whether the 50w can hold this weekend is a key test that could be consequential for the next several months of Bitcoin’s technical market structure.

You are leaving Galaxy.com

You are leaving the Galaxy website and being directed to an external third-party website that we think might be of interest to you. Third-party websites are not under the control of Galaxy, and Galaxy is not responsible for the accuracy or completeness of the contents or the proper operation of any linked site. Please note the security and privacy policies on third-party websites differ from Galaxy policies, please read third-party privacy and security policies closely. If you do not wish to continue to the third-party site, click “Cancel”. The inclusion of any linked website does not imply Galaxy’s endorsement or adoption of the statements therein and is only provided for your convenience.