skip to content

Research • August 14, 2026

Fizzling CLARITY Act Odds Leave Agencies Scrambling to Act

With odds fading for CLARITY Act passage in 2026, the Securities and Exchange Commission was poised to unveil major exemptions to safely promote crypto innovation, but later backtracked.

This article originally appeared in Galaxy Research's weekly newsletter. Subscribe to get timely insights delivered to your inbox every Friday morning.

With odds fading for CLARITY Act passage in 2026, the Securities and Exchange Commission was poised to unveil major exemptions to safely promote crypto innovation, but later backtracked.

The SEC was set to unveil two long-awaited regulatory exemptions this week: Reg Crypto, which will create a new pathway for the primary issuance of cryptoassets to the public; and the Innovation Exemption, which will allow for secondary trading of tokenized securities in decentralized finance. Bloomberg had reported in May that the SEC was on the verge of publishing these exemptions, but the agency then backtracked after significant pushback from the traditional securities industry. New reporting suggested Tuesday that those exemptions were now imminent, but again the SEC appears to be backtracking after Eleanor Terret reported that the innovation exemption was again delayed. And late Thursday, the SEC published a notice about their planned Friday open meeting, which was believed to be about Reg Crypto.

The Commodity Futures Trading Commission is aggressively moving to cement its jurisdiction over prediction market contracts, which it argues are swaps under the Commodities and Exchange Act. This week the CFTC issued an emergency order seeking to countermand New York Attorney General Letitia James' effort to secure a nationwide temporary restraining order blocking Kalshi from offering event contracts (not just sports, bets: James sought to stop the firm from offering trades on “culture, elections, and other events,” emphasis added). The latest salvo follows months of lawsuits between prediction markets venues, U.S. states, and the CFTC, some involving events contracts generally, others focused on sports-related contracts, but all involving questions state vs. federal authority over these markets.

After the successful, bipartisan markup of CLARITY Act by the Senate Banking Committee in May, odds had climbed that the bill could pass the Senate before the August recess (which began on Aug. 7). But as the weeks wore on, several factors obstructed the bill's progress. First, the issue of increased ethics controls for government officials' involvement in crypto, which had been tabled throughout the committee’s processes, reared its head and could not be resolved despite substantial bipartisan efforts. Second, increased pressure from banks – community banks in particular – resulted in some backsliding of support for the bill even from Republicans. Third, calls for further weakening of the developer protections in the Blockchain Regulatory Certainty Act (BRCA) from illicit finance hawks swirled as a specter over the negotiations, though late-stage moderation on the issue by some law enforcement groups seemed to temper fears this issue could derail the bill. All of these factors made it difficult for Senate Majority Leader John Thune (R-SD) to corral the 60 votes needed to overcome a filibuster, and as the calendar waned into the August recess, he declined to call a vote. At the very end of the work period, Sen. Thune did finally "notice" the first vote on the bill, meaning the Senate now plans to vote on CLARITY when it returns from recess in mid-September.

OUR TAKE

The reality is that CLARITY is now much more about politics than policy. The bill is extremely comprehensive and includes registration and licensing requirements, new compliance responsibilities for service providers and new surveillance and sanctions authorities for government, substantial clarifications of law and regulation to protect consumers, and myriad other provisions that promote American leadership, investor protection, and regulatory clarity. None of that matters right now.

Without even considering the banks' lobbying on stablecoin yield or the low-grade simmer of the "illicit activity" issue, without a clear deal on the ethics issue – which a bipartisan group of Senators sent to the White House on Thursday, July 30, but to which the White House never publicly responded – there is likely no pathway to 60 votes in the Senate. Expecting a vote on the bill when the Senate returns in September would be optimistic if not quixotic, not just because these issues remain unresolved but because the September "session" is just 2-3 weeks long: the Senate reconvenes Sept. 14 and adjourns for midterm election activity around Oct. 2. The reality is that unless an initial "motion to proceed" vote happens almost immediately upon the lawmakers’ return to D.C., there will only be enough time for the CLARITY Act to pass the Senate if it dominates basically the entire working session. For these reasons, we are lowering our odds of CLARITY Act passage in 2026 to 10%.

Meanwhile, the SEC's closeness to producing both Reg Crypto and the “Innovation Exemption” (characterized by repeated starts and stops) are instructive both for CLARITY and for crypto policy during the rest of Trump's presidency. First, it's likely that the SEC previously delayed action on Reg Crypto and the Innovation Exemption at least in part to avoid interfering with the politics of the CLARITY Act. That the Commission is clearly close to acting on them now that CLARITY has stalled perhaps reflects an acknowledgement that the bill's odds are severely diminished. Note that Reg Crypto is substantially related to Title I of the CLARITY Act, and the Innovation Exemption directly overlaps with Sec. 10505.

If Senate negotiations may have been stalling the Commission’s announcements of Reg Crypto and the Innovation Exemption, other factors had been pressuring the agency from the other end to act. First, Commissioner Hester Peirce plans to vacate her seat in November (she is required by statute to vacate by the end of the 119th Congress), and it's not hard to imagine that the Commission wants to release these landmark actions before she leaves, given the depth and length of her work on these issues. Second, and more importantly, the Commission needs time for these initiatives. The specific initiatives, in particular the Innovation Exemption, are likely to be structured to offer a time-limited sandbox for issuers to try onchain trading of tokenized securities, the results of which will likely inform rulemaking on the topic. The authorization and occurrence of market activity in the sandbox, as well as the resulting rulemaking, are extremely likely to result in substantial litigation between market participants (particularly traditional finance stakeholders) and the Commission. Advancing these concepts from policy idea to formalized rule is likely to be a multiyear effort, and the Commission needs to start the clock as soon as possible. The urgency here from the Commission makes sense, and we commend it, but the competing pressures of both 1) a desire to advance crypto rulemaking while during this presidential term while 2) facing headwinds from CLARITY and backlash from the traditional securities industry account for the spasmodic nature of the rollout.

CLARITY Act passage remains a possibility, but we are firmly in "circus trick" territory – if it is to pass in 2026, we need magic. Regardless of the CLARITY Act's momentum or outcome, though, we now expect the Commission to publish the texts of Reg Crypto, the Innovation Exemption, or both over the next several weeks or couple months, another reminder that the crypto industry is poised for exciting times and a positive regulatory environment ahead even without CLARITY. – Alex Thorn

You are leaving Galaxy.com

You are leaving the Galaxy website and being directed to an external third-party website that we think might be of interest to you. Third-party websites are not under the control of Galaxy, and Galaxy is not responsible for the accuracy or completeness of the contents or the proper operation of any linked site. Please note the security and privacy policies on third-party websites differ from Galaxy policies, please read third-party privacy and security policies closely. If you do not wish to continue to the third-party site, click “Cancel”. The inclusion of any linked website does not imply Galaxy’s endorsement or adoption of the statements therein and is only provided for your convenience.