CFTC ‘Mention Market’ Guidance Shows Challenge of Policing Novel Contracts
This article originally appeared in Galaxy Research's weekly newsletter. Subscribe to get timely insights delivered to your inbox every Friday morning.
This week the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) released guidance on mention markets, a subset of prediction markets that pertain to individuals’ speech, attendance at events, and interactions.
The advisory’s concern is that mention markets are fundamentally different from standard CFTC-approved event contracts, like “will the Fed hike rates in the next FOMC meeting?” These contracts settle on events that single individuals have little or no control over the outcome of the contract. Mention markets, on the other hand, are different in that they settle on “the discrete conduct of a named person,” such as “will Elon Musk say bitcoin on the next SpaceX earnings call?” As a result, the regulator’s Division of Market Oversight (DMO) notes, there is heightened risk in these markets under Core Principle 3, the statutory requirement that Designated Contract Markets (DCMs) list only contracts that are “not readily susceptible to manipulation.”
The DMO’s reasoning follows three risk vectors:
Ease of manipulation: the person controlling the outcome (or those close to them) can often trigger or avoid the triggering conduct at will.
Information asymmetry: insiders (event staff, scriptwriters, PR handlers) may have advance knowledge of what will happen, creating trading advantages.
Low detectability: when the triggering conduct happens in private, informal settings, or involves non-public figures, there's little independent verification or public scrutiny to catch manipulation.
In light of this, the DMO says Mention Markets should be treated as “presumptively readily susceptible to manipulation,” meaning DCMs face a higher bar to justify listing. The advisory details a four-factor scorecard DMO will use when a DCM files to list such contracts:
Independent obligations constraining the controlling individual
Susceptibility to manipulation through external pressure directed at controlling individuals
Independent verification and substantial public scrutiny.
Robustness of prophylactic trading rules, surveillance, and controls
The advisory says a DCM’s controls (factor 4) can’t be substituted with reliance on the market’s named individual’s own outside legal obligations (factor 1) and that exchanges still have to build their own safeguards.
Notably, the letter is purely informational and creates no binding rule, doesn’t reflect a formal Commission ruling, and does not prohibit DCMs from listing mention market contracts.
Our take
As, er, mentioned above, most CFTC-approved event contracts settle on outcomes single individuals cannot control (e.g. “will the Fed hike or cut?” or “who will win the 2028 presidential election?”). Mention markets are fundamentally different in this regard because they settle on the “discrete, voluntary conduct of a single named person” (e.g. “will Jensen Huang say 'data center' in Nvidia’s next earnings call?”). This creates a structural manipulation risk under Core Principle 3, which requires Designated Contract Markets (DCMs) to list only contracts that are not “readily susceptible to manipulation.”
The CFTC’s advisory addresses part of this risk as it relates to mention markets, but not all of it, without explicitly barring these markets. It’s not due to a lack of effort on the DMO staff’s part, but because the residual risk runs into constitutional protections and evidentiary standards which apply to these types of markets that a listing standard simply cannot resolve. Ther four-factor test functions largely as a transparency and market surveillance filter that can keep the least verifiable and low-scrutiny mention markets (e.g. a remark on a personal phone call or a comment at a closed-door dinner) off exchanges and monitor suspicious market activity. But for markets that do clear the bar (specifically ones around individual speech), verification and market oversight are solved without capturing the full “manipulability” picture. The market’s named individual can simply say the words for any reason, thereby “manipulating” the outcome. If they and those close to them don’t hold a position, they sit entirely outside the regulatory perimeter. The Commodity Exchange Act (CEA) manipulation liability attaches to conduct in connection with trading, and every control the advisory contemplates (i.e. restricted lists, position limits, surveillance, inducement rules) presumes the manipulator has an economic interest in the market or is coordinating with someone who does. A person with neither characteristic avoids all such controls.
Someone who knows a mention market exists but has no economic exposure can still choose to say specific words that resolve the market one way or another.
Nor can that gap be closed prospectively, because the First Amendment prevents a DCM or the CFTC from writing a rule that would reach it; no one can require the named individual to avoid certain words, penalize them for saying them, or compel disclosure of what they intend to say. Someone who knows a mention market exists but has no economic exposure can still choose to say specific words that resolve the market one way or another. Someone who says the trigger phrase deliberately is indistinguishable from one who does so incidentally without proof of direct intent, which can be difficult to obtain in the case of speech.
As a whole, the controls outlined in the CFTC’s guidance can catch manipulation that runs through coordination and trading. But by nature of mention markets, they may struggle with cases where named individuals simply act on their own unprompted judgement. This point is one we made on Galaxy Brains in February.
Legal Disclosure:
This document, and the information contained herein, has been provided to you by Galaxy Digital Inc. and its affiliates (“Galaxy Digital”) solely for informational purposes. This document may not be reproduced or redistributed in whole or in part, in any format, without the express written approval of Galaxy Digital. Neither the information, nor any opinion contained in this document, constitutes an offer to buy or sell, or a solicitation of an offer to buy or sell, any advisory services, securities, futures, options or other financial instruments or to participate in any advisory services or trading strategy. Nothing contained in this document constitutes investment, legal or tax advice or is an endorsement of any of the stablecoins mentioned herein. You should make your own investigations and evaluations of the information herein. Any decisions based on information contained in this document are the sole responsibility of the reader. Readers should consult with their own advisors and rely on their independent judgement when making financial or investment decisions.
Participants, along with Galaxy Digital, may hold financial interests in certain assets referenced in this content. Galaxy Digital regularly engages in buying and selling financial instruments, including through hedging transactions, for its own proprietary accounts and on behalf of its counterparties. Galaxy Digital also provides services to vehicles that invest in various asset classes. If the value of such assets increases, those vehicles may benefit, and Galaxy Digital’s service fees may increase accordingly. The information and analysis in this communication are based on technical, fundamental, and market considerations and do not represent a formal valuation. For more information, please refer to Galaxy’s public filings and statements. Certain asset classes discussed, including digital assets, may be volatile and involve risk, and actual market outcomes may differ materially from perspectives expressed here.
For additional risks related to digital assets, please refer to the risk factors contained in filings Galaxy Digital Inc. makes with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) from time to time, including in its Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2025, filed with the SEC on November 10, 2025, available at www.sec.gov.
Certain statements in this document reflect Galaxy Digital’s views, estimates, opinions or predictions (which may be based on proprietary models and assumptions, including, in particular, Galaxy Digital’s views on the current and future market for certain digital assets), and there is no guarantee that these views, estimates, opinions or predictions are currently accurate or that they will be ultimately realized. To the extent these assumptions or models are not correct or circumstances change, the actual performance may vary substantially from, and be less than, the estimates included herein. None of Galaxy Digital nor any of its affiliates, shareholders, partners, members, directors, officers, management, employees or representatives makes any representation or warranty, express or implied, as to the accuracy or completeness of any of the information or any other information (whether communicated in written or oral form) transmitted or made available to you. Each of the aforementioned parties expressly disclaims any and all liability relating to or resulting from the use of this information. Certain information contained herein (including financial information) has been obtained from published and non-published sources. Such information has not been independently verified by Galaxy Digital and, Galaxy Digital, does not assume responsibility for the accuracy of such information. Affiliates of Galaxy Digital may have owned, hedged and sold or may own, hedge and sell investments in some of the digital assets, protocols, equities, or other financial instruments discussed in this document. Affiliates of Galaxy Digital may also lend to some of the protocols discussed in this document, the underlying collateral of which could be the native token subject to liquidation in the event of a margin call or closeout. The economic result of closing out the protocol loan could directly conflict with other Galaxy affiliates that hold investments in, and support, such token. Except where otherwise indicated, the information in this document is based on matters as they exist as of the date of preparation and not as of any future date, and will not be updated or otherwise revised to reflect information that subsequently becomes available, or circumstances existing or changes occurring after the date hereof. This document provides links to other Websites that we think might be of interest to you. Please note that when you click on one of these links, you may be moving to a provider’s website that is not associated with Galaxy Digital. These linked sites and their providers are not controlled by us, and we are not responsible for the contents or the proper operation of any linked site. The inclusion of any link does not imply our endorsement or our adoption of the statements therein. We encourage you to read the terms of use and privacy statements of these linked sites as their policies may differ from ours. The foregoing does not constitute a “research report” as defined by FINRA Rule 2241 or a “debt research report” as defined by FINRA Rule 2242 and was not prepared by Galaxy Digital Partners LLC. Similarly, the foregoing does not constitute a “research report” as defined by CFTC Regulation 23.605(a)(9) and was not prepared by Galaxy Derivatives LLC. For all inquiries, please email [email protected].
©Copyright Galaxy Digital Inc. 2026. All rights reserved.