Bitcoin’s Largest Institutions Launch $15m Security Initiative
This article originally appeared in Galaxy Research's weekly newsletter. Subscribe to get it in your inbox every Friday.
Nine of the largest institutional participants in Bitcoin have put a number on what it costs to keep the network secure. BlackRock, Fidelity Digital Assets, Coinbase, Strategy, Block, Galaxy, Anchorage, ARK Invest, and Blockstream announced the formation of the Bitcoin Security Consortium this week, pledging $15 million over the next three years for Bitcoin security research and open-source development.
This is not a development organization, nor is it a governance body. The consortium doesn’t write code, and it doesn’t vote on what Bitcoin becomes next. As per the announcement, members “don’t direct its development, and don’t speak for Bitcoin.” Robert Mitchnick, BlackRock’s global head of digital assets, framed the commitment as making “significant additional funding available to support Bitcoin’s long-term security needs.” Mike Schmidt, executive director of Brink (the nonprofit that’s funded Bitcoin Core contributors since 2020) is coordinating the day-to-day effort as a volunteer, independent of any member organization.
The timing tracks with where institutional BTC ownership sits. Spot exchange-traded funds (ETFs), publicly traded treasury companies, custodians, and exchanges now collectively secure hundreds of billions of dollars of BTC. This is a scale of institutional exposure that didn’t exist three years ago. And quantum computing has become one of the most discussed long-term risks to that pile of capital. This consortium is landing the week Galaxy Digital launched our own Bitcoin Quantum Readiness Initiative, committing up to $5 million toward developer grants and a Quantum Advisory Council focused on post-quantum migration (note that Galaxy also joined the Bitcoin Security Consortium). Meanwhile, custody giant BitGo has rolled out quantum risk scoring for institutional wallets, Blockstream has named post-quantum cryptography a top engineering priority for 2026, and Strategy has initiated a Bitcoin security program. The consortium reads as the coordination layer sitting on top of individual company-level activity.
Its mandate is broader than quantum risk. Funding is intended to support protocol security research generally.
OUR TAKE
Bitcoin security funding has historically come from a small group of nonprofits, often operating on budgets that wouldn’t register on any of these nine companies’ balance sheets. That model worked fine when BTC was mostly held by people who’d opted into the risk themselves. It doesn’t hold up as well with hundreds of billions of institutional dollars now sitting on top of the protocol.
Strategy CEO Phong Le put the incentive plainly: long-term holders have every reason to want Bitcoin secure for generations, and funding the people doing that unglamorous maintenance work is a natural extension of holding it. Unlike many other blockchains, Bitcoin has no foundation. (It used to, but that organization ran out of money more than a decade ago, when cryptocurrency was still a fringe interest.) It was never built to have one, but it’s accumulated enough economic value that its security has effectively become a public good with a funding problem. Someone still has to pay the people maintaining the code on which trillions of dollars depend. The consortium is best understood as an attempt to solve that coordination problem in a way akin to how Linux and other critical open-source infrastructure get funded, without introducing centralized governance.
It also invites an obvious knee-jerk reaction: these big companies funding Bitcoin security sounds, to some ears, like “institutions taking over Bitcoin.” The announcement goes out of its way to head that off. Funding developers is not the same thing as directing them. Consensus on Bitcoin still lives exactly where it always has, with users, node operators, miners, and developers in that same slow, occasionally frustrating rough-consensus process that’s kept the protocol credibly neutral for 17 years. The fact that Schmidt is running this as a volunteer keeps nine of the most powerful companies in the industry from having a hand on the wheel. Whether this earns trust in Bitcoin-native circles or gets read as a Trojan horse comes down entirely to whether that line holds.
A year ago, quantum risk to Bitcoin was conference-panel material. It was interesting, distant, and mostly theoretical. No more. None of these announcements mean that a cryptographically relevant quantum computer is imminent, but it signals that the ecosystem has started treating quantum readiness as an engineering problem worth solving on its own timeline.
The most notable part of this consortium is what committing that capital says about where Bitcoin now sits. The standing commitment to collectively fund developer work without asking for control in return is a milestone. Bitcoin’s governance hasn’t changed. The balance sheet of who’s willing to pay for its upkeep just did. - Will Owens
This document, and the information contained herein, has been provided to you by Galaxy Digital Holdings LP and its affiliates (“Galaxy Digital”) solely for informational purposes. This document may not be reproduced or redistributed in whole or in part, in any format, without the express written approval of Galaxy Digital. Neither the information, nor any opinion contained in this document, constitutes an offer to buy or sell, or a solicitation of an offer to buy or sell, any advisory services, securities, futures, options or other financial instruments or to participate in any advisory services or trading strategy. Nothing contained in this document constitutes investment, legal or tax advice or is an endorsement of any of the assets mentioned herein. You should make your own investigations and evaluations of the information herein. Any decisions based on information contained in this document are the sole responsibility of the reader. Readers should consult with their own advisors and rely on their independent judgement when making financial or investment decisions. The economic interests of Galaxy Digital may conflict with the views expressed in this document. Galaxy Digital also provides services to vehicles that invest in various asset classes. If the value of such assets increases, those vehicles may benefit, and Galaxy Digital’s service fees may increase accordingly. The information and analysis in this communication are based on technical, fundamental, and market considerations and do not represent a formal valuation. Galaxy and the author hold a financial interest in Bitcoin (BTC). Galaxy regularly engages in buying and selling BTC, including hedging transactions, for its own proprietary accounts and on behalf of its counterparties. Galaxy also provides services to vehicles that invest in BTC. If the value of such assets increases, those vehicles may benefit, and Galaxy’s service fees may increase accordingly. The valuation in this communication is based on technical, fundamental, and market analysis and not on any formal valuation method. For more information, please refer to Galaxy’s public filings and statements. Cryptocurrencies, including BTC, are inherently volatile and risky and ultimate market movements may not align with this statement. For more information, please refer to Galaxy’s public filings and statements. Certain asset classes discussed, including digital assets, may be volatile and involve risk, and actual market outcomes may differ materially from perspectives expressed here. For additional risks related to digital assets, please refer to the risk factors contained in filings Galaxy Digital Inc. makes with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) from time to time, including its Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, available at www.sec.gov. Certain statements in this document reflect Galaxy Digital’s views, estimates, opinions or predictions (which may be based on proprietary models and assumptions, including, in particular, Galaxy Digital’s views on the current and future market for certain digital assets), and there is no guarantee that these views, estimates, opinions or predictions are currently accurate or that they will be ultimately realized. To the extent these assumptions or models are not correct or circumstances change, the actual performance may vary substantially from, and be less than, the estimates included herein. None of Galaxy Digital nor any of its affiliates, shareholders, partners, members, directors, officers, management, employees or representatives makes any representation or warranty, express or implied, as to the accuracy or completeness of any of the information or any other information (whether communicated in written or oral form) transmitted or made available to you. Each of the aforementioned parties expressly disclaims any and all liability relating to or resulting from the use of this information. Certain information contained herein (including financial information) has been obtained from published and non-published sources. Such information has not been independently verified by Galaxy Digital and, Galaxy Digital, does not assume responsibility for the accuracy of such information. Certain information contained herein constitutes forward-looking statements, which can be identified by the use of terms such as “may”, “will”, “should”, “expect”, “anticipate”, “project”, “estimate”, “intend”, “continue” or “believe” (or the negatives thereof) or other variations thereof. Due to various risks and uncertainties, including those discussed above, actual events or results may differ materially from those reflected or contemplated in such forward-looking statements. As a result, you should not rely on such forward-looking statements in making any investment decisions. Affiliates of Galaxy Digital may have owned, hedged and sold or may own, hedge and sell investments in some of the digital assets, protocols, equities, or other financial instruments discussed in this document. Affiliates of Galaxy Digital may also lend to some of the protocols discussed in this document, the underlying collateral of which could be the native token subject to liquidation in the event of a margin call or closeout. The economic result of closing out the protocol loan could directly conflict with other Galaxy affiliates that hold investments in, and support, such token. Except where otherwise indicated, the information in this document is based on matters as they exist as of the date of preparation and not as of any future date, and will not be updated or otherwise revised to reflect information that subsequently becomes available, or circumstances existing or changes occurring after the date hereof. This document provides links to other Websites that we think might be of interest to you. Please note that when you click on one of these links, you may be moving to a provider’s website that is not associated with Galaxy Digital. These linked sites and their providers are not controlled by us, and we are not responsible for the contents or the proper operation of any linked site. The inclusion of any link does not imply our endorsement or our adoption of the statements therein. We encourage you to read the terms of use and privacy statements of these linked sites as their policies may differ from ours. The foregoing does not constitute a “research report” as defined by FINRA Rule 2241 or a “debt research report” as defined by FINRA Rule 2242 and was not prepared by Galaxy Digital Partners LLC. Similarly, the foregoing does not constitute a “research report” as defined by CFTC Regulation 23.605(a)(9) and was not prepared by Galaxy Derivatives LLC. For all inquiries, please email [email protected].
©Galaxy Digital Holdings LP. 2026. All rights reserved.