Welcome to Galaxy Research's Weekly Top Stories. Subscribe to get this newsletter delivered to your inbox every Friday morning.

In this week's edition, Alex Thorn breaks down the SEC’s new comprehensive crypto asset guidance; Lucas Tcheyan assesses the race to build rails for agentic payments; and Will Owens analyzes the debut of (officially licensed) S&P 500 futures on Hyperliquid.

Got feedback on this newsletter? Email [email protected]. We’d love to hear from you.

Market Update

The total crypto market cap stands at $2.49tn, down 0.00% from last week (when it stood at $2.49tn). Bitcoin's network value is 4.20% of gold's market cap. Over the last seven days, BTC is down 2.56%, ETH is up 0.96%, and SOL is down 0.95%. Bitcoin dominance is 56.69%, down 22 basis points from last week.

The SEC Lets Crypto Be

On Tuesday, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) released landmark guidance explicitly spelling out which types of digital assets are (and are not) securities. Joined by the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC), the SEC announced and published interpretive guidance in the Federal Register that puts digital assets in five categories: digital commodities, digital collectibles, digital tools, stablecoins, and digital securities (“or tokenized securities”). The SEC explicitly states that only the final category would qualify as securities and thus require registration or exemption from registration under the federal securities laws. “Digital securities” are “financial instruments enumerated in the definition of ‘security’ that is formatted as or represented by a crypto asset, where the record of ownership is maintained in whole or in part on or through one or more crypto networks,” according to the SEC’s fact sheet.

The new guidance explicitly supersedes a key 2019 framework for “investment contract” analysis of digital assets (a staff-level document issued by the SEC’s Strategic Hub for Innovation and Financial Technology) during Jay Clayton’s tenure as chairman. Footnotes in the 2019 framework explicitly state that it was “not a rule, regulation, or statement of the Commission, and the Commission has neither approved nor disapproved its content.” Conversely, this week’s 2026 guidance is a Commission-level interpretation, voted on and approved by the Commissioners, and filed in the Federal Register as “Final Rule; Interpretation; Guidance” under 17 CFR 231 and 241. The Commission states it “will administer the Federal Securities laws consistent with the interpretation, including with respect to enforcement actions.”

The guidance formalizes a dramatic shift in the Commission’s approach to regulating the digital assets and crypto industry compared to the Biden Administration’s approach under then-SEC Chair Gary Gensler. Crucially, this 2026 guidance is styled as an interpretive rule, not a legislative rule. The distinction matters enormously under the Administrative Procedure Act (APA). A legislative rule or substantive rule goes through notice-and-comment rulemaking, has the force and effect of law, and binds both the agency and regulated parties. An interpretive rule is exempt from notice-and-comment requirements, does not have the force of law, and merely explains how the agency understands existing statutory provisions. It does not bind courts, the SEC can change its mind later, and it doesn’t grant enforceable rights that market participants can assert against the agency or third parties. But it does tell the market explicitly what to expect from the current Securities and Exchange Commission. Importantly, the guidance was also issued as a joint SEC-CFTC action, with the CFTC agreeing to follow the SEC’s interpretation that non-security crypto assets could meet the definition of “commodity” in the Commodity Exchange Act.

Our Take

This is a big deal for both the milestone it represents and the clarity that it creates. The milestone is hard to miss – the release codifies in writing much of the wholesale shift in attitude market participants have known existed but nonetheless not seen explicitly and comprehensively spelled out. In many ways, it’s the single most concrete exposition of the Atkins SEC’s reversal of the prior SEC’s approach under Chair Gary Gensler, which itself was characterized by a failure to substantially conduct rulemaking or guidance for market participants, an inability for market participants to register or achieve licenses, outright hostility, and myriad lawsuits. We’ve known those days are over for about 14 months, but this document helps explicitly nail that coffin shut (at least for the duration of Atkins’ chairmanship).

The 2019 framework (which this 2026 guidance supersedes) set the stage for the SEC’s Gensler-era enforcement actions in several ways. Comparing the approaches in the two is a helpful way to illustrate the shift in policy. Two big items stand out: the explicit endorsement of the concept that a crypto asset sold as an investment contract could later trade on secondary markets as a non-security, and the reframing of the “efforts of others” analysis in the Howey Test.

One of the most important positions that the 2019 framework implied, and which Gensler’s SEC quite clearly adopted, was that if a token was initially sold as a security, it remained a security in secondary market trading. This formed the foundation of many of the SEC’s assertions in litigation, such as those against crypto exchanges. The 2026 guidance creates an explicit, structured offramp. A non-security crypto asset that was sold subject to an investment contract does not necessarily remain subject to that investment contract in perpetuity. Instead, the SEC provides two pathways for separating the initial sale from secondary trading:

• If the issuer completes the essential managerial efforts it promised (achieves functionality, hits roadmap milestones, open-sources code, etc.) then the investment contract ceases to exist, and the token could trade freely on the secondary market as a non-security. Crucially, the standard for what constitutes “fulfillment” is defined by how the issuer itself described the efforts, not by some external standard of what constitutes “sufficient decentralization” or “functionality.” This eliminates the amorphous “sufficiently decentralized” standard famously articulated by Bill Hinman in

  his 2018 speech

  (and which the 2019 framework seemed to implicitly incorporate).

• If the issuer abandons the project, goes silent for a long enough period, or publicly announces it won’t perform, the investment contract also ceases to exist (although the issuer could remain potentially liable for securities fraud or material misstatements).

The 2026 guidance also provides for a significantly more constrained analysis compared to the 2019 checklist analysis for what constitutes “efforts of others” under Howey in relation to crypto assets. The 2019 framework suggested a long list of activities (does the issuer retain a stake in the token? does the issuer support a secondary market? did the issuer raise excess funds? is the token marketed using terms that indicate investment? etc.) where the more boxes checked, the more likely the token was a security. But that framework gave no clear threshold for when you didn’t reach the threshold. The 2026 guidance replaces this with a much more bounded inquiry that focuses specifically on the issuer’s representations or promises to undertake essential managerial efforts. Only representations or promises by or on behalf of the issuer matter, not third-party hype, unaffiliated community members, or market commentary. Only representations or promises made before or contemporaneously with the sale matter, and post-sale statements can’t retroactively convert a prior sale into a securities transaction. The representations must be conveyed through established communication channels, like official websites, official social media, whitepapers, regulatory filings, or documents clearly attributable to the issuer. And vague promises without actionable business plans, milestones, funding details, or resource plans “likely would not create reasonable expectations of profit.”

The document makes other important distinctions and assertions that provide granular clarity to market participants in ways that prior SEC guidance or frameworks did not, such as explicit clarity on network effects and “promotion” and explicit safe harbors (airdrops are not securities; mining and staking are generally not securities transactions; wrapping or unwrapping an asset does not make it a security when the underlying is also not a security; and on and on).

Suffice to say, this is an important document because it formalizes the shift from the Commission’s hostile approach during the Gensler era to the more progressive approach of the Atkins/Hester Peirce era, and it provides another leg of maturity and clarity that is supportive of further crypto institutionalization.

But, noted above, it can all be undone by a new SEC Commission under a different Presidential Administration. This is why policymakers and advocates continue to press for passage of the CLARITY Act, which would codify many of these same views in durable federal statute. This 2026 SEC interpretive guidance sets up the industry with clarity on some of these key questions for at least the next 30 months, but something like the CLARITY Act could provide a durable legal foundation to let bitcoin, crypto, and blockchains to thrive in U.S. capital markets for decades. -Alex Thorn

Agents Need a Way to Pay. Everyone's Building the Rails

Agentic payments saw a flurry of activity this week as major players across fintech, cloud infrastructure, and crypto moved to stake out positions in what is rapidly becoming one of the most consequential races in payments.

Stripe and Paradigm's payments-focused layer-1 blockchain Tempo launched its mainnet alongside the Machine Payments Protocol (MPP), a new open standard for machine-to-machine payments competing with Coinbase’s x402. Amazon Web Services published a detailed technical paper on integrating x402 into its cloud infrastructure for financial services. Visa Crypto Labs released its first experimental product, a command-line interface (CLI) that lets AI agents make programmatic card payments directly from a terminal. And Coinbase is reportedly competing for a partnership with Cloudflare to build a stablecoin designed specifically for AI agent transactions, a deal that would embed crypto payments at the infrastructure layer of roughly 20% of all web traffic.

The onchain agentic payments landscape is crystallizing around two emerging standards, both built on the HTTP 402 "Payment Required" status code: x402, which we profiled in January, and Stripe/Tempo's MPP. Both are open-source and both solve the same two core problems: how does an agent pay for stuff, and how does a merchant verify it got paid. One notable distinction is that MPP includes built-in support for streaming payments via state channels, allowing an agent to authorize a spending limit upfront and pay continuously throughout a session. Both protocols are chain-agnostic (although each debuted on the chain of the company that developed it). But as open-source protocols they are available on other chains (for example x402 has seen significant volume on Solana and within hours of MPP’s release a Solana implementation was released). You can track real-time activity for MPP here and x402 here.

Separately, Mastercard announced a $1.8 billion acquisition of stablecoin infrastructure firm BVNK, the largest stablecoin M&A deal to date, to connect onchain payment rails with its global network across 130+ countries. While this deal is broader than agentic payments specifically, it underscores how aggressively legacy payment providers are moving to make stablecoin infrastructure core to their plumbing.

Our Take

What's most striking about this week isn't any single announcement. It's that Stripe, Visa, Mastercard, Amazon, and Coinbase are all moving rapidly to enable a world where agents are the dominant counterparty and crypto is a feature in every single one.

We've been tracking the crypto-native thesis in our reports on x402 and agentic capital markets: agents can't open bank accounts or pass KYC, they need payment infrastructure that moves as fast as they do, and stablecoins solve both problems — sub-cent fees make micropayments viable, settlement is instant, and once verified there are no reversals or chargebacks. Amazon building enterprise reference architectures around x402, and Coinbase potentially embedding stablecoin payments into Cloudflare's infrastructure, are meaningful validations that onchain infrastructure will be a major platform for the agentic economy.

Cards aren't going away — they're still better for consumer-facing e-commerce where chargeback protections matter, and legacy networks have the most powerful moat in payments: distribution across billions of cards and millions of merchants. But the more telling signal is where the incumbents are placing their bets. Tempo's design partner list reads like a who's who of global finance — Visa, Mastercard, Deutsche Bank, UBS, Standard Chartered, Nubank, Revolut, Klarna, and Shopify alongside Anthropic and OpenAI. These are the institutions that define global payment flows, and they are actively helping shape a stablecoin-native blockchain. The incumbents aren't just defending their turf. They're moving their clients onchain.

There are still important open questions. Identity is a big one: if agents are transacting autonomously at scale, platforms need a way to verify a real person is behind the activity. World, Sam Altman's identity project, took a step toward addressing this by launching AgentKit this week — a toolkit that lets agents carry cryptographic proof they're backed by a verified human, integrating directly with x402. Fraud, spending controls, and dispute resolution in a world of autonomous agents remain largely unsolved as well.

The dominant theme in crypto over the past two years has been its convergence with traditional finance as ETF launches, stablecoin adoption, and tokenization soared. This week showed that convergence extending to payments infrastructure in a way that puts stablecoins and blockchain rails at the center of how the next generation of payments gets built. The agentic economy may prove to be the most consequential arena for that convergence yet. – Lucas Tcheyan

The S&P 500 Just Went Onchain

S&P Dow Jones Indices licensed its flagship S&P 500 index to TradeXYZ, a real-world asset (RWA) perpetuals platform built on Hyperliquid, to launch the first official S&P 500 perpetual contract. The contract is live now, trades 24/7, settles in USDC, offers up to 50x leverage, and is available to eligible non-U.S. market participants.

This is not a synthetic approximation. S&P is providing institutional-grade real-time index data directly, making this the highest-fidelity onchain equity derivative ever built.

TradeXYZ launched in October 2025 and has already crossed $100 billion in cumulative volume, with an annualized run rate above $600 billion. It operates under Hyperliquid’s HIP-3 framework, which allows permissionless market creation (for more on HIP-3, see here). It has become the dominant force on the platform. Of Hyperliquid’s top 30 markets by volume, 23 are now non-crypto assets.

The traditional S&P 500 futures contract traded on the CME is a quarterly product. It requires rollovers, brokerage access, and trades only during market hours. TradeXYZ’s perpetual has none of those constraints. For global macro traders outside the U.S., it looks like a materially better product. It offers cheaper access, is always open, and is composable like the rest of onchain finance.

Cameron Drinkwater, S&P’s Chief Product and Operations Officer, called the new perps an expansion of “access and utility” for the firm’s benchmarks in “digital trading environments.” Collins Belton, COO and General Counsel for TradeXYZ’s parent company, was more direct: “The S&P 500 is a natural starting point. It represents the most widely tracked equity index on earth.”

The geopolitical context makes the timing relevant. Amid escalating U.S.-Iran tensions and Strait of Hormuz fears, oil prices spiked and Hyperliquid’s WTI perpetual, which tracks crude oil, went from roughly $20 million in daily volume to more than $1 billion. This surge made it briefly the second-ranked contract on the platform behind only bitcoin (BTC) perps.

Traders used Hyperliquid as a real-time war desk when CME was closed. Gold and silver perps have seen similar surges. The S&P 500 perp slots directly into that same use case: continuous, leveraged, macro exposure that doesn’t care what time it is.

In that light, the S&P contract is not merely a legitimacy checkpoint. It’s a commercial product built for exactly the kind of around-the-clock volatility the world keeps delivering. Coinbase and other centralized exchanges offer crypto perps and some index exposure, but nothing like an officially licensed equity index perpetual at this scale. Hyperliquid’s onchain model (transparency, non-custodial, always on) is eating into a market centralized exchanges (CEXs) never fully captured.

As of writing, the S&P perp has done $106 million in 24-hour volume with $50 million in open interest. HYPE, Hyperliquid’s native token, moved higher on the news.

Regulators (particularly the CFTC) are still working out their framework for onchain perps.

Our Take

S&P licensing its flagship index to a DeFi platform is a pretty huge deal. S&P has been inching toward crypto rails since 2021 (crypto indices, tokenized treasury ratings, a Digital Markets 50 index) but this is the first time it’s put its most important product directly on a decentralized venue. It didn’t build its own chain. It didn’t go to a CEX. It went to Hyperliquid.

When HIP-3 launched, the knock was that permissionless market creation would attract junk and that chasing RWA perps could be the wrong bet. This deal is about as clean a validation as you can get.

That choice matters. It suggests that for institutions exploring onchain distribution, Hyperliquid’s performance and liquidity profile is now taken seriously enough to be a credible partner instead of a curiosity. S&P’s imprimatur gives TradeXYZ’s broader RWA product suite a legitimacy anchor. For Hyperliquid, every major TradFi asset that lands onchain is another reason traders never have to leave the platform. House of all finance.

TradFi perps are not “coming to crypto.” They are literally already here. – Will Owens

Chart of the Week

Michael Saylor's Strategy bought 22,337 BTC last week for approximately $1.57 billion at an average price of ~$70,194. This is Strategy's largest single-week purchase of 2026 and ranks as the fifth largest by BTC acquired in the company's history (though when measured by dollar cost, it falls to eighth, because earlier purchases at higher prices commanded larger dollar totals for fewer coins). The company's total holdings now stand at 761,068 BTC, acquired for $57.6 billion at an average cost of ~$75,696 per coin.

For the first time, Strategy's STRC perpetual preferred stock, often referred to as "Stretch," served as the primary capital source, with ~$1.18 billion raised via STRC issuance versus $396 million from common equity sales. Launched in July 2025 at a 9% dividend and an IPO price of $90, STRC has since seen its rate hiked multiple times to its current 11.5% annualized yield in order to support trading near its $100 par value.

Strategy isn't the only institutional bid showing up. U.S. spot Bitcoin ETFs logged their first seven-day inflow streak since November last week, pulling in $1.16 billion as total ETF net assets climbed to nearly $100 billion.

In Other News

• 🇺🇸White House unveils national AI legislative framework

• 🤝Polymarket acquires DeFi infra startup Brahma...

• 🍻️...and opens a bar in D.C. for monitoring the situation

• ✅SEC okays rule change allowing tokenized stocks on Nasdaq

• 👻CFTC no-action letter: wallet developer Phantom not a broker

• 🏦U.S. regional banks building tokenized deposit network on ZKsync

• 🦑Kraken said to pause IPO plans

• 🤖Crypto.com cuts 12% of staff, pins job losses on AI push