skip to content

Coinbase Capitulates on Creator Coins in Base Team Shakeup

Hero Ethereum-3

This article originally appeared in Galaxy Research's weekly newsletter. Subscribe to get the most timely insights delivered to your inbox every Friday morning.

On Wednesday, Base creator Jesse Pollak said he's stepping back from leading Coinbase's Base app to focus on the chain itself, handing the app to Jordan Fish (better known as Cobie) and recommitting Base to three priorities: trading, payments, and AI agents.

In a long and candid post on X, Pollak called the first quarter of 2026 "a punch in the face" and admitted that half of the two-part bet he'd spent the last two years working on had failed. He'd wagered that builders and onchain-native social experiences would drive crypto's next wave of adoption. Builders delivered, through stablecoins, prediction markets, and perpetuals. Social didn't. Farcaster, Zora, miniapps, and creator coins, in his words, "disintegrated completely." The focus on social left Base behind where it counted. Its native apps in perps (Avantis) and prediction markets (Limitless) trail competitors that have scaled, and Base is also lagging on the tokenization and payments tooling enterprises actually wanted.

Pollak’s post followed one from Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong two days earlier. On Monday, Armstrong conceded to a critic on X that content coins "didn't work" and that it was "time to turn the page," while pushing back on the idea that AI agents are just the next hype cycle. Base, he said, has consistently prioritized trading, payments, and agents "in that order," with most engineering resources going to trading.

Cobie (short for “crypto Cobain”) joined Coinbase last year through its roughly $375 million purchase of his fundraising platform Echo. Pollak framed the handoff as returning the app to Coinbase while he focuses all of his efforts on building Base into "the blockchain for global finance."

OUR TAKE

It’s hard to imagine the timing of this announcement – two weeks after the debut of Robinhood Chain (see our prior coverage) – was a coincidence. Robinhood Chain's early "success," if you can call memecoin volume success, only sharpens the criticism of Base. Coinbase now has a direct competitor (with significant retail distribution) shipping a nearly identical product, and it gave up whatever early lead it had by pouring development into exactly the wrong things, social and content coins most of all.

Social trading isn't the problem. We've argued the opposite, that other forms of it are some of the fastest-growing verticals in crypto. Look no further than social trading app FOMO's recently announced $550 million valuation. The idea that flopped was narrower and weirder: that the content itself should be the asset, that posting something should mint a coin. That model scattered attention across thousands of tokens backed by nothing, mostly producing short bursts (sometimes minutes) of frantic trading that never held and burned users who had no idea what they were doing. Jesse Pollak himself launched a “creator coin” ($JESSE) in November 2025 that debuted at $6.5m market cap and fell as much as 94%.

Beyond burning users, the experiment pulled attention and resources away from the growth areas where competitors are getting real traction. Base today accounts for less than 0.1% of total perpetual futures open interest across all chains and has no prediction market with meaningful traction. (To be fair, Robinhood Chain looks just as fallow here, but it only just launched). The problem is that the areas driving most of crypto's growth right now – perpetuals, prediction markets, and tokenization – are also the most competitive, and every chain is throwing everything at them. Base gave up a big lead, and its advantage now is its own distribution and not much else. Even on equity tokenization, there’s a real argument to be made that Base would not qualify for the exemptions in the pending CLARITY Act: if the chain doesn’t become more decentralized, it could be classified as a Non-Decentralized Finance Trading Protocol under Sec. 301 of the bill. If that happens, Base likely could not play host to the anticipated growth of regulated U.S. tokenized securities without running afoul of securities registration requirements.

None of which means it's all been a failure. Coinbase's Morpho integration for lending has been a real success, with close to $3 billion in borrow originations. Its small but growing onchain AI ecosystem is one of the better ones in crypto, with projects including Venice driving usage through private inference and new forms of inference tokenization (see our recent coverage here). The team finally owning the mistake is the first step toward righting the ship to drive more success stories like these.

The outstanding question for exchange-backed chains is how they drive growth for the corporation. Binance Smart Chain is the biggest success story here, but it also was a first mover, has an integrated token (whether Coinbase ever launches a token is a big outstanding question), and operates under very different regulatory constraints. From our perspective, the best approach for these teams is to seed their ecosystems with the centralized exchange distribution they already have, rather than renting mercenary capital that leaves the moment the incentives dry up. The thesis, for now, is the DeFi “mullet.” Get people using the chain without really knowing they are (Coinbase/business in the front, DeFi/party in the back). Once they're locked into the ecosystem, that user base pulls in builders who use the permissionless chain to ship new products that drive the next leg of growth. Who knows? Maybe one of those might even turn out to be content coins (don’t hold your breath).

If nothing else, at least Cobie's running the Base app now.

You are leaving Galaxy.com

You are leaving the Galaxy website and being directed to an external third-party website that we think might be of interest to you. Third-party websites are not under the control of Galaxy, and Galaxy is not responsible for the accuracy or completeness of the contents or the proper operation of any linked site. Please note the security and privacy policies on third-party websites differ from Galaxy policies, please read third-party privacy and security policies closely. If you do not wish to continue to the third-party site, click “Cancel”. The inclusion of any linked website does not imply Galaxy’s endorsement or adoption of the statements therein and is only provided for your convenience.